<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Molcajete and Tejolote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ophthosurgery.com/2009/02/molcajete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ophthosurgery.com/2009/02/molcajete/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Concrete Sealer</title>
		<link>http://ophthosurgery.com/2009/02/molcajete/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Concrete Sealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophthosurgery.com/?p=305#comment-154</guid>
		<description>It’s really a nice and helpful piece of information. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s really a nice and helpful piece of information. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ophthosurgery</title>
		<link>http://ophthosurgery.com/2009/02/molcajete/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>ophthosurgery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophthosurgery.com/?p=305#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I did notice that the C&amp;B one sort of feels like the pumice stones for exfoliation. I will take a look at the W-S one next time I get a chance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I did notice that the C&#038;B one sort of feels like the pumice stones for exfoliation. I will take a look at the W-S one next time I get a chance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sir</title>
		<link>http://ophthosurgery.com/2009/02/molcajete/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>sir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophthosurgery.com/?p=305#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I am not sure that the crate and barrel molcajete is authentic basalt.  I think it actually is pumice.  The Williams-Sonoma Molcajete I saw, which retails for $49 is much nicer, and is unmistakably basalt.  I think I am going to return my C&amp;B and cough up the extra $17 for the one at Williams-Sonoma!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure that the crate and barrel molcajete is authentic basalt.  I think it actually is pumice.  The Williams-Sonoma Molcajete I saw, which retails for $49 is much nicer, and is unmistakably basalt.  I think I am going to return my C&#038;B and cough up the extra $17 for the one at Williams-Sonoma!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

