I remember when Instant Messaging flooded the workplace computers back in the tech-boom days. My colleagues working at IBM would get company-wide emails stating that IM decreased productivity and was prohibited. When company threats weren’t heeded, port 5190 was blocked on the company firewall.

Now that instant messaging has been superseded by text messaging and MMS, I see my colleagues “texting” away during conferences and lectures. It’s become a nuisance. If you’re simply notifying your spouse that you’ll be late for dinner, that’s one reason to be texting during fluorescein conference. However, checking the stock ticker? Chatting with your medical school classmate? What are you thinking? That is simply abusing technology. Perhaps I say this only because I don’t have a data plan on my phone, but there is a point in which your attention should be directed toward the lecturer and not your iPhone.

Our eye clinic is in the basement, where our cellphones unreachable by the outside world. You’d think that there wouldn’t be any contact with the outside. Wrong. Last week one of the technicians (who are supposed to be obtaining visual acuity for our patients) was logged onto her MySpace page. Another computer was logged onto Facebook.

I wonder how much social networking affects workplace productivity. A quick search online shows that this actually increases productivity. USAToday also states that we work better with social networking… The caveat? None of these companies are involved with healthcare.

computing, medicine rant, tech, work

I ended up installing the Palm Pre SDK to test out the development kit. It includes the Palm Pre emulation engine, which runs from VirtualBox.

Although I’ve never used the physical hardware phone before, the software interface is very slick, similar to that of the iPhone. The snapshot includes the Web browser in action, which supports touch-dragging and zoom.

If I ever find the time, it would be interesting to develop some software for it.

computing computing, tech

Virtualization software like VMware and VirtualBox allows you to run multiple OS’s on a single system without rebooting. This capability is convenient for cross-platform testing of web software without the need for multiple systems. I’ve always used it as a bridge between my linux and windows applications–having a script-ready bash terminal makes batch processing of data a breeze. About a year ago, a friend introduced me to virtualizing with the same operating system. Something like running Windows within Windows.

Why would you ever do this? I wondered the same thing, but it adds a good layer of security to my computer. Since virtual drives are only accessible via specified shared folders, any disaster within the virtual operating system is contained. This is most applicable to my VPN connection into the hospital. My employer uses a Citrix web interface to allow outside connections into the hospital intranet.

For those of you who have used Citrix, it is bloated junkware that pollutes your system files. Moreover, it does not work well with certain software firewalls, like COMODO. After uninstallation, the program litters your folders with nondescript file links and useless files. I found that I can contain the installation through my virtualized OS. Neat huh?

Whenever my hospital junks Citrix or requires another bloated software suite, I can throw it into my virtual OS. If the installation trashes my system, I can just delete my virtual drive and start over. No damage done to the host.

computing tech

I was excited to see a hardware refresh on Apple’s iPod Touch last week, but it’s unfortunate that the new models have technology that isn’t fully implemented, such as 802.1n draft or a camera. Moreover, the clock speed increase in the new models (600mhz) and Voice Control/microphone capabilities aren’t available in the budget 8gb model.

Simply put, that is ingenious marketing.

The new Nano includes an FM transmitter and a camera, features that the neither the classic nor the touch sport. This obviously allows Apple to advertise a wide product line and focus its tech support on specific products. The base software kernel in all of its products is similar, and allows for efficient cross-platform upgrades.

As a consumer, however, I’d want everything in my portable device. As a medical professional, I’d choose the iPod Touch/iPhone to be my technology device. Obviously, Skyscape and Epocrates, two medical software companies, have already gravitated to this platform. The hardware acceleration on the Touch allows for gaming, but also image viewing (CT/MRI). We can easily modify the iPod Touch output to a projector for presentations.  The downside of this technology? Price.

The 16gb and 32gb models are similar in pricing to full-sized netbooks or 12″ thinbooks, which can arguably “do more” than the ipods. It’s a tough sell.

Which product would you choose if you could only have one?

computing computing, tech

Ophthalmic pathologist Mort Smith sports a tablet PC for his lectures. I suppose that a nifty touch screen can come in handy when you’d like to circle some Merkel cells in your presentation for emphasis. Tablet PC’s are traditionally geared toward the mobile user who simply needs technology for note-taking and flashy presentations. These systems typically range from the 2lb-<4lb range, with limited video acceleration and slower disk platters (with the exception of those with solid-state drives).

I don’t find that tablet PC’s are entirely useful for medicine, since netbooks and superlights a la MacBook Air are plentiful. However, there is potential for tablet PC’s to be useful for the niche market of ophthalmology. We draw. We label diagrams with color, all in our progress notes. A touchscreen serves as the bridge between the ophthalmic exam and EMR. This union is not novel–Mayo Clinic’s ophthalmology department implements its own ophthalmic EMR that synchronizes seamlessly with the entire hospital’s records.

TabletPCreview.com, the de facto standard review site for tablets is a good starting point to explore the current product line. These systems do command a higher price tag than their non-tablet counterparts, but it is impressive how much power you can fit into the package. I’ve been entertaining the idea of acquiring a tablet for a while, and I almost made the jump until rumors surfaced about Apple’s venture into the table realm. That is a killer hardware that I’m itching to get my hands on.

It will be an interesting product cycle in the upcoming year…

computing, medicine ophthalmology, tech